Maret Ani vs Gisela Dulko Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L W W L W L L L L
Form
W L L L L W L L W LH2H: Ani 1 - 1 Dulko
They have played 4 sets in total, with Ani winning 2 and Dulko winning 2. The last match between Ani and Dulko was at the Abierto Mexicano TELCEL presentado por HSBC - Acapulco, 25-02-2009, Second, Clay with Maret Ani getting the victory 7-6(6) 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Maret Ani | 1 |
| Gisela Dulko | 1 |
Abierto Mexicano TELCEL presentado por HSBC - Acapulco(25-02-2009)
7
6
6
3
| Ani | Stats | Dulko |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| Ret. | Ranking | Ret. |
| 63 | Highest Rank | 26 |
| 43 | Age | 40 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 7 | Titles | 5 |
| 54% (251-212) | Career Total W/L | 53% (269-236) |
| $92,254 | Career Prize Money | $1,254,605 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 1 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Baez VS Dzumhur PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Popyrin VS Bublik PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(6) 6-3 |
Stats 
Maret Ani
Player
Gisela Dulko
67%
(
48 of
72)
1st Serve %
68%
(
57 of
84)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
38%
(
9 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
43%
(
31 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
43 of
84)
84
Total Points Won
72
|
||||
| 6-0 7-6(7) |
Stats
Gisela Dulko
Player
Maret Ani
71%
(
45 of
63)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
63)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
12
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
24 of
35)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
5 of
28)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
26 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
34 of
63)
71
Total Points Won
55
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 19 | Games Won | 22 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 14 | Total Double Faults | 8 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 61% (83/135) | 1st Serve % | 69% (102/147) |
| 67% (56/83) | 1st Serve Win % | 57% (58/102) |
| 27% (14/52) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (20/45) |
| 60% (9/15) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 63% (10/16) |
| 47% (69/147) | Return Points Win % | 48% (65/135) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (1/2) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Maret Ani Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rubber 3 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kathrin Woerle
Player
Maret Ani
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve %
56%
(
25 of
45)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
13 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
54
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 2-6 6-1 7-5 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-4 2-6 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF | 3-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Rubber 4 | 2-6 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
view more
Gisela Dulko Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-5 4-6 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Vesna Dolonc
Player
Gisela Dulko
65%
(
61 of
94)
1st Serve %
59%
(
51 of
86)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
56%
(
34 of
61)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
75%
(
6 of
8)
46%
(
43 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
40 of
86)
91
Total Points Won
89
|
1-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mirjana Lucic-Baroni
Player
Gisela Dulko
64%
(
75 of
117)
1st Serve %
68%
(
78 of
114)
9
Aces
2
10
Double Faults
4
59%
(
44 of
75)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
46 of
78)
57%
(
24 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
42%
(
49 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
53 of
114)
121
Total Points Won
110
|
6-3 6-7(7) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gisela Dulko
Player
Carla Suarez Navarro
77%
(
76 of
99)
1st Serve %
76%
(
79 of
104)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
50%
(
38 of
76)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
35 of
79)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
60%
(
9 of
15)
Break Points Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
49%
(
49 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
56 of
104)
106
Total Points Won
97
|
6-4 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Anastasia Rodionova
Player
Gisela Dulko
64%
(
63 of
99)
1st Serve %
65%
(
50 of
77)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
36%
(
13 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
45%
(
45 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
32 of
77)
86
Total Points Won
90
|
2-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kateryna Volodko
Player
Gisela Dulko
67%
(
54 of
81)
1st Serve %
53%
(
49 of
93)
4
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
8
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
33%
(
9 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
17 of
44)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
58%
(
7 of
12)
48%
(
39 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
46 of
93)
88
Total Points Won
86
|
2-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sofia Arvidsson
Player
Gisela Dulko
67%
(
44 of
66)
1st Serve %
56%
(
40 of
71)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
36%
(
8 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
44%
(
29 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
71)
73
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Maria Sharapova
Player
Gisela Dulko
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve %
48%
(
21 of
44)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
65%
(
20 of
31)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
38%
(
18 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
30 of
44)
59
Total Points Won
32
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 1-0 ret. | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 54% (251/212) | Win/Loss | 53% (269/236) |
| 53% (578/513) | Sets Win/Loss | 52% (601/545) |
| 52% (5241/4868) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (5375/5169) |
| 53% (52/46) | Hard Win/Loss | 49% (115/122) |
| 52% (116/108) | Clay Win/Loss | 60% (114/75) |
| 63% (77/46) | Indoor Hard W/L | 52% (23/21) |
| 33% (6/12) | Grass Win/Loss | 49% (17/18) |
| 0.02 | Aces Per Game | 0.09 |
| 94 | Aces Total | 472 |
| 0.08 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.21 |
| 374 | Total Double Faults | 1058 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 537.88 | Average Opponent Rank | 465.97 |
| 60% (2461/4126) | 1st Serve % | 60% (10535/17555) |
| 59% (1466/2465) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (6447/10535) |
| 39% (646/1667) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (3135/7042) |
| 49% (246/498) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (992/2149) |
| 46% (1838/4033) | Return Points Win % | 45% (7963/17830) |
| 40% (21/32) | Slam W/L | 53% (47/41) |
| 35% (7/13) | Masters W/L | 44% (52/66) |
| 42% (5/7) | Cups W/L | 67% (12/6) |
| 46% (47/55) | Main Tour W/L | 56% (126/99) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 62% (171/105) | Challenger W/L | 57% (32/24) |
| 0% (0/0) | Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 54% (248/456) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 53% (264/499) |
| 67% (2/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 52% (54/103) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 54% (59/110) |
| 54% (90/167) | Deciding Set Win % | 52% (74/142) |
| 82% (243/200) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (268/231) |
| 18% (243/43) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (268/37) |
| 23% (219/50) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 16% (237/38) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
